January 1, 2008
First post of 2008
Posted by teageegeepea under Blinded by Science, Blogosphere soap opera, I Don't Need Society!I’ve updated the previous post several times, so if you only read it when I first posted it, you might want to check it again.
Happy New Years to everybody. Around this time many people like creating lists of significant things that happened in the year we wave goodbye too, but the only one of them I find interesting enough to link to is Radley Balko’s Worst Prosecutor of the Year. Though not quite a list, a yearly tradition I enjoy very much is the Edge World Question. The question is “What have you changed your mind about? Why?“. I haven’t gotten very far into it, but I’d be surprised if it wasn’t well worth my time and yours (UPDATE: Couldn’t resist linking to Thomas Metzinger’s: There are no moral facts).
Eliezer Yudkowsky, after irritating people in his previous posts with his fondness for Singularity/cryonics and antipathy for religion, decides to take on politics in the Two-Party Swindle, which is great for anybody but especially libertarians and anti-war types. One area I disagree with it is mentioned the topics; basically Caplan’s theory that the voters are getting what they asked for good and hard. Through my nefarious influence I got Jim Henley at Unqualified Offerings to discuss it, and he quibbles with Eliezer over whether the analogy should be to professional athletes or college ones. I have written earlier about my views on the subject in the post Against Politics, which is why I decided to create a mirror of the site by that name (which I might put off fixing up for a while). In a somewhat relevant old post, Hopefully Anonymous (who still hasn’t updated his blog like he said) rails “against the concept of “both sides” as opposed to n-th possible sides“. mtraven is dismissive of that kind of talk, but wanders near that direction in Which side are you on?
In an unexpected event, IOZ sent me an e-mail saying he would add me to his blogroll. Aside from the unusualness of sending a message rather than just gettin’ ‘er done, I was surprised by the move as I am in some respects, and especially from his perspective, a Bad Person and might taint the blog, as I have on occasion his comments section.
I started reading the thing I was being somewhat vague about in the last post but got distracted, though I intend to finish it tonight and then begin writing. Will you readers get to see the results? I don’t know, you’ll just have to stay tuned!
January 19, 2008 at 7:21 pm
For a few days I was grateful that your lack of new posts had given me enough time to go through your archives and blogroll a bit further (that Moldbug guy is some kind of mutant X-men polymath whiz-kid, for sure; makes me feel like taking down my own site in embarrassment), but now I’m starting to get anxious. I see you commenting elsewhere, so I know you’re still kicking, but dude, spare us a word or two or a picture of your dog or something.
If you’re working up to something big, humble apologies.
January 19, 2008 at 8:33 pm
I promised to myself that I would not make another post until I got working on a piece of writing I promised someone else but have not yet written a single word for. In a fit of delusional optimism, I hope to hack out 5 pages of bull by the 23d. Even if I fail at that, by the end of the month I’ll have either finished or abandoned it. In the mean-time, here is a picture of my dog.