Pew has a new survey on the reception of different political buzz words by demographic characteristics. “Socialism,” “Capitalism” and the like. It’s no surprise that the latter word elicits a more positive reaction among Republicans than Democrats than the former, and vice versa. But here is something interesting:
More than four-in-ten independents (44%) react positively to the word “libertarian,” while 32% have a negative reaction. Democrats are nearly evenly divided (39% positive, 37% negative). However, Republicans on balance have a negative impression of this term (44% negative, 31% positive).
I’m not sure how to account for this; perhaps the first part of the word “libertarian” sounds too much like “liberal” to Republicans? I admit it’s awfully tortured reasoning on my part.
Generally speaking the wealthier you are the more positively you respond to “Capitalism,” which should satisfy the liberal’s understanding of class interest. But the same goes for education – the more you have, the better you respond the C word – which could confound the liberal’s understanding of what college is supposed to teach one about the world.
But not too much can be read into this. Responses to the words “Socialism” and “Capitalism” are not correlated:
Perhaps surprisingly, opinions about the terms “socialism” and “capitalism” are not correlated with each other. Most of those who have a positive reaction to “socialism” also have a positive reaction to “capitalism” [emphasis mine]; in fact, views of “capitalism” are about the same among those who react positively to “socialism” as they are among those who react negatively (52% and 56%, respectively, view “capitalism” positively). Conversely, views of “socialism” are just as negative among those who have a positive reaction to “capitalism” (64% negative) as those who react negatively (61% negative).
What is America trying to tell us, that it’s state capitalist?
May 19, 2010 at 3:55 pm
Libertarian in the long run are even dumber than progressives. They simply don’t have the power to implement their bad ideas like progressives do.
People are generally ok with them now because it’s a good sounding philosophy. As is communism, liberalism, ect. If they ever got into power I would Libertarianistan would look a lot like Somalia.
May 19, 2010 at 4:03 pm
it’s shouting loud and clear that it doesn’t understand big words and that it was told there would be cake.
May 19, 2010 at 5:44 pm
“I’m not sure how to account for this; perhaps the first part of the word “libertarian” sounds too much like “liberal” to Republicans? I admit it’s awfully tortured reasoning on my part.”
How about this – libertarians, personally, are a bunch of fucking weirdos. Republicans typically have little tolerance for oddness, so they don’t like libertarians.
May 19, 2010 at 6:15 pm
How about this – libertarians, personally, are a bunch of fucking weirdos
Indeed, according to Tyler Cowen they are basically autistic:
http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2009/06/autistic-economics.html
So that makes it not nice to call them “fucking weirdos” you know.
May 19, 2010 at 9:53 pm
Libertarians — since they comprise an alternative political party more closely aligned to Republican values — threaten to splinter and diminish the Republican base; therefore, Republicans may react more negatively to the term since libertarianism is a greater threat to their own party’s political prospects.
May 19, 2010 at 11:14 pm
Maybe some people just generally react positively. Or maybe people are stupid.
May 20, 2010 at 1:47 am
What is America trying to tell us, that it’s state capitalist?
Because we already knew that.
May 24, 2010 at 10:11 pm
How about the simplest explanation: this kind of Pavlovian test is just useless when it comes to accurately measuring actual political beliefs.
If you honestly answer the question without trying to express your opinions about the underlying concepts then your answers might appear incoherent.
“Do you have a negative reaction to the word socialism?
-No, let’s call a spade a spade.
Capitalism?
No, capitalism is awesome.”
Besides, words might be loaded. For example, actual supporters of Capitalism seem to prefer the term “free market”.
Similarly, mainstream left certainly does not like the word “socialism” these days. It’s economic justice, alleviating income inequality etc.
Like Obama says: “Throwing around phrases like ‘socialists’ and ‘Soviet-style takeover,’ ‘fascists’ and ‘right-wing nut’ …. closes the door to the possibility of compromise…
At its worst, it can send signals to the most extreme elements of our society that perhaps violence is a justifiable response.”
Therefore the S-word is now officially beyond the pale. It’s loaded.
What does a negative reaction to the N-word tell? It reveals that you don’t like the word or the concept. In other words, nothing.
May 25, 2010 at 7:44 pm
Philip Converse claimed that the public doesn’t have (or comprehend) any political ideology and that their answers to surveys are “non-opinions”.